The New York Times covered this alarmingly high rate of questionable voter 
    purges in their article linked at  
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27093919/. Author and investigative 
    journalist Greg Palast teamed up with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to educate 
    voters about this problem before it was too late to re-register, through 
    their website and downloadable book at  www.stealbackyourvote.org.
      | 
       | 
    
    The greater issue about this was not widely discussed. We now have 
    corporations in control of sensitive private information about voters and 
    their party affiliation; vendors who control the databases by purging 
    voters using frivolous criteria created by each individual state at the 
    whim of the partisan election officials and the corporations themselves,
    often operating from private agendas.  Worst of all, the voter frequently 
    does not discover until Election Day that they have been deleted from the 
    database, when it is too late to re-register.
      | 
       | 
    
    The Move Away From Paperless Electronic Voting, and To Optical Scan 
    Counters: From the frying pan, into the fire!
      | 
       | 
    
    Courageous Secretaries of State in California (Debra Bowen) and Jennifer 
    Brunner (Ohio), after commissioning comprehensive, scholarly studies on 
    electronic voting systems that turned up horrifying evidence of how easy 
    they are to tamper with and hack, have instigated policies to limit and 
    eventually eliminate the paperless touch screen voting systems altogether. 
    Florida has already implemented this ban of DREs (Direct Recording 
    Electronic) machines throughout the state.
      | 
       | 
    
    Unfortunately they have gone to the "solution" of optical scan counters 
    which are used to count paper ballots. Is it better to have paper "in case 
    of a recount"? Sure, IF the numbers are even close enough to tip off one 
    of the candidates that a recount is needed. And IF the challenging 
    candidate has enough money to pay for a recount, which can run in the 
    hundreds of thousands of dollars. And IF the recount isn't hacked such as 
    in Ohio in 2004 (see story of two Ohio election workers convicted of
    rigging the Ohio recount in 2004:  
    from www.moritzlaw.osu.edu.
      | 
       | 
    
    But the "Catch 22" of optical scan counters is they can easily be hacked 
    to create results that would discourage a candidate from filing for a 
    recount. In the HBO documentary "Hacking Democracy"  http://www.hackingdemocracy.com 
    you can watch the simple hack of a ballot scanner, done in minutes by the 
    Black Box Voting "hacking team" of Harri Hursti and Dr. Herbert Thompson: 
    Swapping out a credit-card-sized memory card, this one simple action 
    totally and undetectably "flips" election results on a Diebold Optical 
    Scan Counter.
      | 
       | 
     |