The New York Times covered this alarmingly high rate of questionable voter
purges in their article linked at
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27093919/. Author and investigative
journalist Greg Palast teamed up with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to educate
voters about this problem before it was too late to re-register, through
their website and downloadable book at www.stealbackyourvote.org.
|
  |
The greater issue about this was not widely discussed. We now have
corporations in control of sensitive private information about voters and
their party affiliation; vendors who control the databases by purging
voters using frivolous criteria created by each individual state at the
whim of the partisan election officials and the corporations themselves,
often operating from private agendas. Worst of all, the voter frequently
does not discover until Election Day that they have been deleted from the
database, when it is too late to re-register.
|
  |
The Move Away From Paperless Electronic Voting, and To Optical Scan
Counters: From the frying pan, into the fire!
|
  |
Courageous Secretaries of State in California (Debra Bowen) and Jennifer
Brunner (Ohio), after commissioning comprehensive, scholarly studies on
electronic voting systems that turned up horrifying evidence of how easy
they are to tamper with and hack, have instigated policies to limit and
eventually eliminate the paperless touch screen voting systems altogether.
Florida has already implemented this ban of DREs (Direct Recording
Electronic) machines throughout the state.
|
  |
Unfortunately they have gone to the "solution" of optical scan counters
which are used to count paper ballots. Is it better to have paper "in case
of a recount"? Sure, IF the numbers are even close enough to tip off one
of the candidates that a recount is needed. And IF the challenging
candidate has enough money to pay for a recount, which can run in the
hundreds of thousands of dollars. And IF the recount isn't hacked such as
in Ohio in 2004 (see story of two Ohio election workers convicted of
rigging the Ohio recount in 2004:
from www.moritzlaw.osu.edu.
|
  |
But the "Catch 22" of optical scan counters is they can easily be hacked
to create results that would discourage a candidate from filing for a
recount. In the HBO documentary "Hacking Democracy" http://www.hackingdemocracy.com
you can watch the simple hack of a ballot scanner, done in minutes by the
Black Box Voting "hacking team" of Harri Hursti and Dr. Herbert Thompson:
Swapping out a credit-card-sized memory card, this one simple action
totally and undetectably "flips" election results on a Diebold Optical
Scan Counter.
|
  |
|