|
Frank Cotolo
December 8, 2022 |
  |
This year we have read how world history would have be presented if written by the art and
literature movement based on deliberate irrationality and the negation of traditional artistic
values? Dada. Now, let us read their definition of world history:
|
  |
World History (as a proper title) is documented through a wide spatial place inside the mind, but
World History does not always, if ever, see the world as a unit. Though never planted as a fruit,
the world of WH (World History) reflects the zones of tool mastery, decades of ducks and waddles
and waddling battles and whispering despots, bogus and boisterous and downright fat, who ruled
territories beyond surgery and afterbirth.
|
  |
Our historians see the thick horseshoe of national picks and axes and divide them into grapefruit
sections of time, energy, handcuffs and the dinosaurs that married the surrounding castles of
political pregnancy.
|
  |
Each century waves debonair cortisones from dusk till dawn and hundreds of years past melt into
odors of generational skunk juice, all of which we properly inscribe before the elk stampede in
the tents of mankind's more subtle elbowed redemption.
|
  |
Human kind has always been poorly distributed through green lands of any people from that area
and when light was discovered, only the blind could snort the energy and pass it on to their young
ones, the youngest who were just born and the carpenters of vulva that stitched their longevity.
We harbor the past in words for that reason alone, though the watershed is the truth of all that
shouts for the sake of a damsel's beans.
|
  |